One year. One city. Endless opportunities.

Lay of the Land, Part 2: Turning Around Detroit's Neighborhoods

This marks the second half of a conversation I had over the weekend with Deborah L. Younger, the executive director of Detroit LISC and the newly appointed treasurer of the fledgling city-run land bank. Yesterday, she explained how Detroit's land problems have accelerated. Here, she outlines some of the strategies she believes will help the city better manage its 138.77 square miles and revitalize its communities.

Please check it out -- as well as the first half of the interview -- and offer your own thoughts about the issue and her ideas…

OK, so you've laid out some of the big problems we're confronting in terms of managing the land here in Detroit. What're some solutions?

DEBORAH L. YOUNGER: You do have to have a master plan that's data-driven. So you really need to look at neighborhood indicators of stability. We've often operated from a need-based assessment. We need to flip that and work from an asset-based assessment: Where are the strongest neighborhoods in Detroit, and what do we want to preserve there? Let's start there first.

Some of the other neighborhoods, we have gone too far (into decline to save). We have to accept that. That doesn't mean that you massively relocate people. But you don't encourage investment in those neighborhoods that are declining. We need to marshal our resources and target in a way that brings leverage. And the mistake that's often happened in Detroit is that we want to help everybody in every neighborhood. And we don't have enough resources. It's not that those people should be neglected; it's that you have to really understand that you don't have enough resources.

If you are going to have impact, we're suggesting a couple of neighborhoods that you start with. We're looking at the data. Like the Boston-Edison District. If you don't save Boston-Edison, then you can't save anything else around there. Boston-Edison is at a 20 percent vacancy rate right now. A neighborhood in crisis is at about 10 percent.

So when you say, ‘save' these neighborhoods, what does that look like? What does that really mean?

DLY: It means making the investments you need; using the land bank to get control of the available housing stock. Buy it. Get control of it. Set the market yourself, rather than letting speculators and others come in. And not all investors are bad, but right now, you can buy houses in Detroit for kids' allowances. You really have to (set the market).

And then you really have to think about what we want to be. So you stablize neighborhoods, but then what do you do with that other land? We could recreate Central Park if we wanted to. We could become the greenest city in America, not just from green space but also from green technology...What do we want to look like? Should residential neighborhoods be surrounded by green necklaces? Those could connect us neighborhood to neighborhood. You have a neighborhood here, and then there's green around that neighborhood. And then you have on there that's surrounded by green. In essence, what you get are little urban villages. There are parts where we could grow wildflowers or have urban farms.

We have to use demolition resources better. We (currently) tear down houses that don't have to be torn down. For instance, in Brightmoor, there need to be 35 demolitions of houses that would really improve and stabilize the parts of Brightmoor that can be (stabilized). So why go over here where it's not stable and spend your demolition resources? Unless it's a health and safety hazard, don't spend your demolition resources over here. Let ‘em blow away. Let ‘em fall down. Because if you would do 35 key demolitions, maybe we could do infill back on those 35 plots and relocate people who want to stay in Brightmoor but maybe can't stay on their street. Maybe you're not moving people from Brightmoor to the eastside, but maybe you can stabilize parts of the neighborhood, do key strategic investments.

I'm seeing demolition go into some parts, and I'm like, ‘No. I'm giving you the plan. You asked me to give it to you, city. Don't do demolition over here. We need you to put the resources here and stabilize what we have.' So you start to then align strategy and resources. Here's the strategy; this is the stable part of Brightmoor, and we're going to enhance that. This is the destabilized part, we're not going to invest our resources there.

Haven't past officials barricaded off an area or two of the city before? And haven't some of these places become magnets for litter, dumping and crime?

DLY: Yeah, I don't think that's effective. You can't do it in the context of one neighborhood. Even me, although the city asked us to do it, it was hard to do a plan for Brightmoor without a context of the rest of the city. Because you can't make real strategic recommendations. Like maybe the North End is re-populated with residents from Brightmoor. But I couldn't do that because my task is to figure out a plan for Brightmoor. So we have to have a master plan that takes all of this into consideration. Otherwise, we end up doing stuff piecemeal and it becomes not an agreement of strategy.

This is going to require a huge education and advocacy piece, because people are wedded to where they grew up, where they are living.

What do you think about eminent domain as a tool?

DLY: I've been on the side that's used it. I worked in government for a while. And it's certainly very emotional. But sometimes, I think it's an effective tool to move a city forward. And from a utilitarian standpoint, sometimes it is about the greatest good for the greatest number, and those are the tough decisions that leadership has to make. And I think that until you have leadership that's willing to make those tough decisions, we're going to continue to flounder. It's tough. And it's often not career-building for mayors to take that on.

The first peole who've done this were Eastern bloc countries when the walls came down. The notion of downsizing really was a European notion. So they are the leaders. America has been slow to adopt that philosophy because, again, we plan for growth. We always think more people are coming so this notion of planning to right-size your city has not been embraced until recently.

Have you identified neighborhoods whose size needs to be reduced? If so, what are they?

DLY: (Chuckles) I won't go on the record on that one.

But wait, you said we need leadership that's willing to make those hard choices.

DLY: The only reason I say that is because (Detroit mayor Dave Bing) has his staff working on (land management issues), and I don't want to get out ahead of him. But I'll be ready soon.

Well, residences aren't our only concern when it comes to abandonment. We also have large commercial structures that have been neglected and are monuments to blight, including buildings like the old Packard Plant and the Michigan Central Depot. What do you do with places like these?

DLY: There have been (primarily European) cities that have taken those (kind of) structures and made them part of open space, green space. They've made them climbing walls. They've made ‘em public gardens. They've creatively de-constructed them in way that they are still there, but are now part of the new city. They are still there, but they've made them party of the public space in a way that still allows the community to connect with those places, but they aren't seen as blight anymore.

How have they just sat there all this time before this?

DLY: Because no political will. And I know I've beat that to death, but in cities that work, there's a vision. And from the vision strategies develop and you resource them. That's why cities that work work.

No city is 100 percent together. But I give the example of this: In NY, they too had 100,000 vacant properties. LISC, Enterprise, HUD, the state of NY and the city of NY got together and said, ‘OK, here is our strategy for dealing with these 100,000 houses. We're going to devote – and everybody – most of our resources into the elimination of 100,000 vacant properties. It's part of what led to the rebirth of Harlem.

And for 10 years, they worked that strategy. Everybody knew the rules. It was transparent. Developers knew if you did these 10 things, you got money. Everybody knew. And everybody committed their resources faithfully to this strategy. You didn't say, ‘OK, yeah, I'll add that to my list of strategies, but I'm only going to put 5 percent of my budget there.'

You were here during the last gasps of the Kilpatrick administration. Did you work with them at all? And what were some of your thoughts about how they approached right-sizing?

DLY: I don't think they were there yet. I think the past administration's notion of the Next Detroit neighborhood initiative (was) the articulation that neighborhoods should be revitalized, not just downtown. Up until then, you didn't hear City Hall espousing a vision around neighborhood strategies. But they weren't there on land management, not really.

Why not?

DLY: Because I think they just went on another path. The mayor had his vision that he was going to work in these six neighborhoods: two which were really, really bad, two which were middle-of-the-road and two which were stable. (Right-sizing) just wasn't their notion, their master strategy.

Part of the reason LISC created the Detroit vacant property campaign is to get people to start talking about this as a macro issue rather than neighborhood by neighborhood. It's why we continue to work around the vacant property issue and bring people to the table. I just don't think there was a vision yet (with the past mayor) – I'm not saying it wouldn't have come.

If we adopted the strategies you discuss, how long do you think it will take to get our land issues under control?

DLY: Where's my crystal ball? (Laughs) I don't know the answer to that. But it didn't get this way overnight. I think we can make in-roads. If we begin to develop the infrastructure and system that looks like we're moving in that direction we will begin to (draw attention). Right now nobody's coming to Detroit.

I'm not saying we need outsiders to save us. But let's face it, we have a lot of resources that, in the 21st Century, are going to be important. The next wars aren't going to be fought over oil. They're going to be over water. We have it all here. We've got a skilled workforce that's trained. We've got physical plants, land that can be an asset. So if we would just position ourselves to look like there's a plan, there's a system and infrastructure, I think you would start to attract the intellectual capacity and talent that you need…

Now, we look like we don't know who we want to be. We're kind of wandering in the wilderness.

A friend of mine argues that, in shrinking the operational size of the city, we also create a land scarcity that boosts value. Would you agree?

DLY: I agree. And the flip part of this, the part I'm very concerned about, is that we ought to create some land trusts as a tool for a couple of things: A) To create scarcity B) to make sure we retain affordability, so that the current residents of Detroit can remain residents of Detroit. I think that's important. Typically, when economic opportunity has come – and I think it will come to Detroit – we want to make sure that the people that are here aren't left behind, as is what has happened in the past.

I think we're beginning to write our business plan. And I have to say this: It'll be a couple of years before the land bank really knows who it wants to be.

Michigan, by the way, has the most progressive land bank legislation in the county. It affords so many tools to the land bank that allows it to not just be a land disposition group, but a redevelopment agency as well: There's the "brownfields" tax credits you can use. Also, 50 percent of the taxes of whatever you take into the land bank accrue to the land bank. So if taxes are collected on any of those parcels, the land bank gets 50 percent of them. And land banks have the ability to seek bond financing. (We) don't issue them, but you utilize tax collections as repayment strength.

Any more tools that we need in Detroit to help get us back on track?

DLY: I didn't realize that we don't really have a housing court here. We need one. Progressive cities have housing courts. And they deal with absentee landlords and all that. What you can do is take one judge and make them the housing court. I just discovered that and said I have to get people on top of that. That's one more thing for me to take on: The creation of housing court.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (11)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    All a very good read part 1 and 2, I hope that a very comprehensive and well maintined manifesto of sorts will be brought forth for the public to once again enjoy the city as a prosperous mecca to the future.

    I look forward to seeing the direction the city government takes and what sacrifices the city will take on to make it all happen.

    If I may be brutally honest... This endevor will require the help of all of the tri-county not just Detroit alone. We will all have to help reinvent our once great city for the benifit of our children and future generations to come after them.

  • 2

    Once again, in a well-written piece, Mr. Dawsey has brought to the nations attention the real complexity of many of the issues facing the city that Time believes is near death. Detroit is clearly a city in crisis and there are obviously no easy answers. This two part series speaks volumes about the importance of using data to generate solutions to problems that affect large groups of people. The residents of Detroit have to be more informed about the future of the place we call home...otherwise....we will all witness the Death of Detroit....Keep the information coming Mr. Dawsey...there are still a few of us that genuinely care about the D !!!

  • 3

    Water, land, physical plants -- the basics of survival, sustainability, independence. Excellent. I like the way this woman thinks and hope she can steer Detroit in a positive new direction and away from old approaches which have been proven not to work.

    • 3.1

      I hope I am wrong but I have heard rumors that LISC is for letting Eliza Howell Park go and developing this beautiful 200 acre green space for a big box store and more houses. With all the available space in Detroit, this is not thinking outside the box and is not good for the Rouge River watershed and the health of the future generations of Detroit children.

  • 4

    Dear Readers,

    As a residing freelance journalist I will be critical, fair and impartial to Time Magazine while they live here in Detroit from Aug. 2009 - Aug 2010. But, it begs to ask the question though, "Just what in the hell are Time Magazine staffers doing here in Detroit?" Lets me just back up here on an inventory of events just to be fair along with the suggestions/criticism I have to offer because, Time Magazine has really got me concerned and very angry at the quality of the body of their journalism. And, I'm sorry sensationalism isn't gong to cut the mustard here with any hawk-eyed shred of common sense from me or others locally.

    Steve Gray came here Aug 2009 with one blog and 81 comments, two television interviews during October 2009 with Channel 56, "Am I Right" with Nolan Finley & Debbie Dingle and Channel 7, Chuck Stokes, "Spotlight On The News." At the end of October 2009 two additional staffers of Time Magazine Ms Dybis and Mr Dawsey offered two blogs; one about a Canadian Lore of a Red Dwarf and Beer and the other blog that of "Land Bank" in Detroit and the newly appointed, Director, Deborah L. Younger.

    Granted Time Magazine had a sensational entrance with a grandstanding introduction plastering the cartoon effigy of Detroit all over their front cover, thus amplifying the city and state of Michigan as a poster child of an impoverished society in the nation and, downfall of housing foreclosures, unemployment, and joblessness. Iit remains to be seen where Time Magazine has NOT been least of all participating in the community of Metro Detroit. Now! If the intension is for Time Magazine staff is to stay held up in their house doing their interviews and stories then, I think they need to have a better game plan and, here is why?

    With the notable absence of Time Magazine I have been in attendance to the inaugural conference, "The Business of Plugging In 2009," Detroit MI. An informative means of identifying the progress of Hybrid Cars, Electrical Plug-in-Cars, reformation of the electrical grid and the provision of congressional bills and jobs it will provide both now and in the future. Notable attendees in panelled discussion were former Gov Potaki of New York, retired General Wesley Clark, Gov. Jennifer Granholm and William "Bill" Clay Ford of Ford Motor Company. Since the introduction of Steve Gray on the local media circuit I have not seen the ofference or invitation to freelance journalist to shadow or co-author with staffers on a scintilla of transparent news worthy commentary which, is contrary to that of realtime media moguls of Channels 2,4 &7 in Detroit.
    Well, how about staffers performing a workshop with local freelance journalists?

    Are the Time Magazine Staff creating good relations or just circumventing hyper-sensationalism to sell print and promote Time Magazine's status?

    Either way this is one very unhappy camper dissatisfied with the performance and quality of journalism from Time Magazine. During my time out purveying the black-tie circuits and conferences it remains to be seen as to what precisely is Time Magazine doing in Detroit? I sure as heck couldn't tell you even though I have my proverbial eye like a hawk watching, waiting and commenting. I know it's a dirty job but, somebody has to watch the press to keep things equitable and fair.

    Let me know what you think? I hope to interview Tom Barrow, candidate elect for Mayor of Detroit November 3, 2009 and I intend to ask current Mayor, Dave Bing, "In the shadows and disgrace of former Mayor, Kwame Kilpatrick," is the Mayoral seat of office for sale with the likes of; Peter Karmanos Jr owner of Compuware, Dan Gilbert of Quicken Loans, Matty Mouran owner of Ambassador Bridge in Detroit, Jim NIcholson owner of PV Chemicals Rodger Penske owner of Penske Automotives and Car Racing in Detroit, Illitch Family of Detroit owners of Red Wing and Comerica Park, Parnership for Detroit LLC, a collage of Detroit owned businesses where entrepreneurs reside in the burbs. Look! Most of these folks gave Kwame and Carlita Kilpatrick a total of $290,000 to leave Detroit and go to Dallas,Texas. What isn't for sale in Detroit? It sure isn't the middle class or city employees being forced to negotiate lower wages to do more work.

    How do you rate Time Magazine? Have they lowered their presence to the public with goggle-eyed fear mongering tabloid gossip or are they still a cut above the rest in superior journalism? Is Dave Bing, Mayor of Detroit for sale? I can tell you that there is nothing more EVIL than Detroiter's present suffering in the this current economy. Let me now your opinion....

  • 5

    I have lived in Detroit for most of my adult life. I have watched two healthy neighborhoods deteriorate before my eyes. I now live in what was once a thriving black middle class neighborhood with lawyers and other professionals as neighbors. I have watched over the past ten years as the decay has set in. On a block that ten years ago had no empty homes, I now see two or three or more boarded up homes per block.
    Many of my black middle class friends have moved out of the city due to the fact that they can get lower taxes, lower insurance rates and better police, fire and education services in the surrounding suburbs. There is an oft- quoted number of 10,000 folks per year leaving the city but only once have I seen a look behind those numbers. You have to look at what income groups are growing in the city and what income groups are shrinking. As far as I recall the folks in the $20,000 per year were growing and the folks in the $40,000-$80,000 per year were abandoning the city in droves. Take a closer look at who is leaving and you will get a far better idea of what is going on economically in this city. I fear that the idiots on city council will not make major cuts that are needed. Their only ideas thus far are to raise taxes which will drive even more folks out of an overly taxed, underly serviced city.

    • 5.1

      Very well said, I agree with you whole hartedly. To have to live in a city that taxes you to know end with out giving you services that are worth the taxes you spend. We all have one big mess to clean up. Both the city and the subburbs will be needed to fix it. Team work and education will be the golden parachute of Michigan and Detroit.

  • 6

    My name is Riet Schumack, resident of Brightmoor, director of Youth Growing Brightmoor. People like Deborah and others working in Neighborhood development, government,etc. need to be more creative in their thinking. Brightmoor does not fit the typical pattern of revitilization. However we have a lot of land that could be used for urban farming. This year we farmed one city lot with 12 youth and earned $2700 which was divided among the youth as profit sharing. We could have sold 3 times that much if we would have had it. There are thousands of empty lots i Brightmoor. People could make a living or supplement their income or feed their families.I have fed my family of 8 fresh organically grown veggies from June through now ( have not bought any since June) It is NOT all right for us to live among burned out places, they are always a health hazard. Instead we need the government to funnel stimulus money to Brightmoor to employ DETROITERS to remove these houses so we can start with a clean slate. In Brightmoor we need a zoning amendment to allow small scale farming and husbandry. This will attract idealistic young folks, who are wiling to put up with inconveniences in exchange for a being able to live sustainably and creatively. Let's get rid of the sub urban sprawl ideas in city planning and think outside the box.

  • 7

    try this website

    The head of a Detroit community revitalization group and city land bank official talks about what the city must do to change the fortunes of its neighborhoods - The Detroit Blog -

  • 8

    this hyperlink

    The head of a Detroit community revitalization group and city land bank official talks about what the city must do to change the fortunes of its neighborhoods - The Detroit Blog -

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Detroit Blog Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Detroit Blog in your inbox and never miss a day.

More News from Our Partners

Quotes of the Day »

NICHOLAS FISHER, expert at Stony Brook University in New York who took part in a study which found that bluefin tuna contaminated with radiation believed to be from Fukushima Daiichi were present off the coast of California just five months after the nuclear meltdown.